To celebrate the release of revision 16 of my Free Culture Tabloid sided poster, I’ve put together each section into it’s own US letter poster so that a multi-poster display can be created using all of the pieces.
Do you like the edits that have gone into each revision? Is the wording easy to understand and direct enough for public consumption? Please give me your thoughts in the comments below.
This poster has been in the works for a while, but I’m happy enough to finally publish it today:
It’s available in source form from Spread Ubuntu here and on the deviantArt page you can order a print if you can’t make your own prints.
If you think the work I do to make our cultural ideas more easily understood, consider dropping a few sheckles1:
What do you think?
Update: I put in fresher text which should help some of the older stale text be more understood.
This is my entrant into the Ubuntu Free Culture Showcase, it’s a wallpaper made in inkscape currently in widescreen format.
This image brought to use by FLOSS:
Open and Responsible in the Herd.
There is a set of icons that just got posted to deviantArt and it got me thinking about the problems with artists understanding licenses:
The icons are great and these works are awesome and I love that artists are playing with the creative works that are shared in the greater commons available from the Ubuntu community. The problem of course is that ubuntu-mono is licensed as CC-BY-SA, in ubuntu-mono/debian/copyright:
(c) Canonical Ltd 2004- 2009
Unless otherwise indicated, artwork is available under the Creative Commons Attribution Share-alike license v3.0 or any later version.
The artist has published his work under a CC-BY-SA-NC license, it turns out that the work is inspired by but not a derivative work, bit if this new work had been based on the original ubuntu-mono icons, then they should be licensed CC-BY-SA as the share-alike terms specify.
Most of the time it’s just confusion and ignorance about the rights and requirements of various licenses and the need to check the licenses when creating derivative works. See the comments below for examples of confusion over the creative commons website text and what issues it can come up with.
This is actually quite hard to manage on the desktop since we don’t express license terms per file in any way on the desktop, it’d be on my wishlist to have some kind of indication on files when they have license terms marked in their meta-data. For SVG files this is quite easy as the terms are normally in the meta headers.
What are your thoughts? Do we do enough to help artists understanding licenses?
My dearest community, please consider spending a minute of your time reading this early draft of a poster I am constructing. It’s target audience is the general masses attending libraries, colleges and other public places and it’s attempting to genteelly introduce people to Free Culture concepts.
I need to make sure my working is good as well as my spelling, the blue boxes are for images which I’m getting a fellow artist to sketch up and should go in there soon. Do let me know if you want the svg before it’s complete, once out of draft I’ll add it to spread-ubuntu in A3 and Ledger sizes. Thank you everyone!
There have been a number of articles recently about pirates and using Free and Open Source software and it’s certainly an interesting consideration. In my opinion the problem is that people shouldn’t be fleeing a life with pirated software that’s being removed from their use (I’d say control, but users of software that is possible to pirate never really had control) by fleeing towards FOSS substitutes and I’m reminded of a quote today:
“It’s easier to understand what your running from than what your running into”
But that’s the other problem isn’t it, lots of people _still_ think Free Software is freeware. That price and immediate satisfaction are the only worthy considerations in software. Will attracting people who don’t have FOSS education into the community with the promise of free (as in water) software really help understanding why it was dumb to invest in proprietary software in the first place? Won’t they just go back to their chains with the first new gizmo *iphone* that comes along to dazzle them?
“That’s the problem with freeing people. Once you’ve freed the people they tend to do things you think are a bad idea, including making themselves slaves again.”
Shouldn’t we be trying to teach users _why_ they should support FOSS principles that:
- Scientifically peer reviewed engineering is better.
- Group collaboration is more efficient.
- User participation is more effective.
- Transparency is more trustworthy.
- Openness is more educationally valuable.
- Freedom means greater self control.
- Multiple rights holders reduces artificial restrictions.
- Enlightened self interest funds development and progress.
- And that this ownership means a choice between self reliance and support.
I’d be happier about us going out there into the world helping people with piracy problems to use Ubuntu, “Linux” or other Free and Open Source Software is along with these technical marvels we could explain why and how they exist in the first place instead of just pretending that the magic community did it.
I decided that we should have a deviant art group for creative commons too, So I’ve done that:
But I’m not going to be as hands on with that group, I just want to see what kind of attention it will attract naturally.
I was asked recently to help do some graphics for an Ubuntu community friend ausimage, the job was to encourage Creative Commons, FOSS and all other free and open community creators to show their support on their blogs and web pages. The project is called “Free and Open Works” and has three different concepts…
So I helped make the following graphics to help the branding:
You support the Free and Open community and their creations. Sharing your appreciation of quality works available in the community. Your patronship and support for the ideals of the commons encourages future works and further development.
You create and improve works for the Free and Open community. Sharing your talent or expertise with the community as a whole. Your works provide others with joy as well as a foundation to others to build derivative works.
You donate or commission works in the Free and Open community. Sharing your capital resources to provide tools and payment that bring about works in the community.
The wording is still fairly new, so any input on the whole idea is still very welcome and people interested should head over to the website: http://www.ausimage.us/CreativeCommons/HomePage
I’ll be adding both creator and benefactor images to my blog, since I both create Creative Commons and GPL works and commission works from artists which are then licensed under Creative Commons.
Download the svg source files here.