<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Ubuntu Branding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doctormo.org/2010/03/04/new-ubuntu-branding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doctormo.org/2010/03/04/new-ubuntu-branding/</link>
	<description>Just this guy, you know.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:46:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://doctormo.org/2010/03/04/new-ubuntu-branding/comment-page-1/#comment-3069</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 05:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctormo.ubuntu-ma.us/?p=2002#comment-3069</guid>
		<description>From the screenshots in the initial report of the new theme I got to say it&#039;s an improvement over the previous theme for Ubuntu. I just wish that the UI designers at Canonical would consider taking a look at the netbook interface and perhaps changing it up a little, maybe perhaps make the interface more like what is being done with the KDE 4 netbook interface.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the screenshots in the initial report of the new theme I got to say it&#8217;s an improvement over the previous theme for Ubuntu. I just wish that the UI designers at Canonical would consider taking a look at the netbook interface and perhaps changing it up a little, maybe perhaps make the interface more like what is being done with the KDE 4 netbook interface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkC</title>
		<link>http://doctormo.org/2010/03/04/new-ubuntu-branding/comment-page-1/#comment-3048</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctormo.ubuntu-ma.us/?p=2002#comment-3048</guid>
		<description>@Flimm: Funny you should say that... have a look at my submission to the Free Culture Showcase:

http://www.peppertop.com/greys/?p=253

I love the new design... but unfortunately the loss of the &quot;Linux for Human Beings&quot; tagline renders my submission a bit anachronistic. Thankfully it wasn&#039;t too hard to fire up Inkscape and modify it to suit the new branding a bit better:

http://www.peppertop.com/greys/?p=268</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Flimm: Funny you should say that&#8230; have a look at my submission to the Free Culture Showcase:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.peppertop.com/greys/?p=253" rel="nofollow">http://www.peppertop.com/greys/?p=253</a></p>
<p>I love the new design&#8230; but unfortunately the loss of the &#8220;Linux for Human Beings&#8221; tagline renders my submission a bit anachronistic. Thankfully it wasn&#8217;t too hard to fire up Inkscape and modify it to suit the new branding a bit better:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.peppertop.com/greys/?p=268" rel="nofollow">http://www.peppertop.com/greys/?p=268</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felicia</title>
		<link>http://doctormo.org/2010/03/04/new-ubuntu-branding/comment-page-1/#comment-3043</link>
		<dc:creator>Felicia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctormo.ubuntu-ma.us/?p=2002#comment-3043</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s clean and &quot;space-age&quot;, likely to remain hip and modern for a few distributions.   These positive changes should carry though to all versions, especially the muddled &quot;brainstorm&quot; Yuck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s clean and &#8220;space-age&#8221;, likely to remain hip and modern for a few distributions.   These positive changes should carry though to all versions, especially the muddled &#8220;brainstorm&#8221; Yuck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://doctormo.org/2010/03/04/new-ubuntu-branding/comment-page-1/#comment-3042</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctormo.ubuntu-ma.us/?p=2002#comment-3042</guid>
		<description>I like the new logo.  Logos that are too &quot;busy&quot; just overloads the message.  I don&#039;t need to know this is for &quot;Human Beings&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the new logo.  Logos that are too &#8220;busy&#8221; just overloads the message.  I don&#8217;t need to know this is for &#8220;Human Beings&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randall</title>
		<link>http://doctormo.org/2010/03/04/new-ubuntu-branding/comment-page-1/#comment-3041</link>
		<dc:creator>Randall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctormo.ubuntu-ma.us/?p=2002#comment-3041</guid>
		<description>Stylistically, it&#039;s a great step forward. Looks clean and fast.

I think the bigger story is in the removal of the Linux branding from the tagline, the web site, etc. This will allow Ubuntu to come to (mass) market with fewer misconceptions. Naming a distribution after a specific component (kernel) was never a good idea. May as well name it GRUB if that were acceptable.

Now, if only they could somehow convey the correct pronunciation of the brand: &quot;Oo-boon-too&quot; (as it is said in it&#039;s original language.) It&#039;s still getting butchered by too many... Maybe that&#039;s a throwback from the &quot;Lye-nucks&quot; days ;)

Cheers,
Randall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stylistically, it&#8217;s a great step forward. Looks clean and fast.</p>
<p>I think the bigger story is in the removal of the Linux branding from the tagline, the web site, etc. This will allow Ubuntu to come to (mass) market with fewer misconceptions. Naming a distribution after a specific component (kernel) was never a good idea. May as well name it GRUB if that were acceptable.</p>
<p>Now, if only they could somehow convey the correct pronunciation of the brand: &#8220;Oo-boon-too&#8221; (as it is said in it&#8217;s original language.) It&#8217;s still getting butchered by too many&#8230; Maybe that&#8217;s a throwback from the &#8220;Lye-nucks&#8221; days <img src='http://doctormo.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Randall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oliver</title>
		<link>http://doctormo.org/2010/03/04/new-ubuntu-branding/comment-page-1/#comment-3038</link>
		<dc:creator>oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctormo.ubuntu-ma.us/?p=2002#comment-3038</guid>
		<description>- having a redesign is ok I suppose
- I liked the focus on &quot;Human Beings&quot;, and would appreciate if that would still be the focus (rather than &quot;Light&quot;)
- the new theme (grey panel, black panel icons, purple background) is difficult to distinguish from OS X desktop (compare the Light screenshots with http://seanmcgrath.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/sean-leopard-desktop.png or http://media.photobucket.com/image/os x desktop/spidy333/desktop.png), so after a causal glance on Ubuntu desktop people might put us into the same corner as Mac users which I see as very wrong
- minor nitpick: in the image you embedded above, the little circle-of-friends logo looks a bit like a trademark symbol (c) (r) or a footnote 1)2)*) like in telecoms ads - both rather unfortunate associations
- dislike the fact that the new brand was internally developed and then announced to the unwashed masses</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- having a redesign is ok I suppose<br />
- I liked the focus on &#8220;Human Beings&#8221;, and would appreciate if that would still be the focus (rather than &#8220;Light&#8221;)<br />
- the new theme (grey panel, black panel icons, purple background) is difficult to distinguish from OS X desktop (compare the Light screenshots with <a href="http://seanmcgrath.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/sean-leopard-desktop.png" rel="nofollow">http://seanmcgrath.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/sean-leopard-desktop.png</a> or <a href="http://media.photobucket.com/image/os" rel="nofollow">http://media.photobucket.com/image/os</a> x desktop/spidy333/desktop.png), so after a causal glance on Ubuntu desktop people might put us into the same corner as Mac users which I see as very wrong<br />
- minor nitpick: in the image you embedded above, the little circle-of-friends logo looks a bit like a trademark symbol (c) (r) or a footnote 1)2)*) like in telecoms ads &#8211; both rather unfortunate associations<br />
- dislike the fact that the new brand was internally developed and then announced to the unwashed masses</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimbo</title>
		<link>http://doctormo.org/2010/03/04/new-ubuntu-branding/comment-page-1/#comment-3036</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 12:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctormo.ubuntu-ma.us/?p=2002#comment-3036</guid>
		<description>If comments around the web are anything to go by, by and large people either love the new branding or don&#039;t really care either way, as its the new default theme that is getting all the talk. Window controls in the left corner being a huge talking point. 

You might argue its a shame that people seemingly don&#039;t care about the branding as much as the theme, but in a way I think thats right. People don&#039;t love Macs because they like the logo more than the MS logo, they ultimately use Macs because of the style of the specific product&#039;s software and hardware.

Theme aside, I think the biggest change is actually the website not the logo. Having a slick, modern website that invites people into trying out Ubuntu is going to a huge step forward, and IMO will have a much bigger positive effect than changing the font of the logo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If comments around the web are anything to go by, by and large people either love the new branding or don&#8217;t really care either way, as its the new default theme that is getting all the talk. Window controls in the left corner being a huge talking point. </p>
<p>You might argue its a shame that people seemingly don&#8217;t care about the branding as much as the theme, but in a way I think thats right. People don&#8217;t love Macs because they like the logo more than the MS logo, they ultimately use Macs because of the style of the specific product&#8217;s software and hardware.</p>
<p>Theme aside, I think the biggest change is actually the website not the logo. Having a slick, modern website that invites people into trying out Ubuntu is going to a huge step forward, and IMO will have a much bigger positive effect than changing the font of the logo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flimm</title>
		<link>http://doctormo.org/2010/03/04/new-ubuntu-branding/comment-page-1/#comment-3035</link>
		<dc:creator>Flimm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 12:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctormo.ubuntu-ma.us/?p=2002#comment-3035</guid>
		<description>I quite liked &quot;Ubuntu: Linux for human beings&quot; slogan, until a friend of mine spotted it on the back of my laptop and asked me: &quot;who else would it be for? Aliens?&quot;
Which is great! It shows that Linux is losing its image of being too difficult for normal people. We can move on to a new slogan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quite liked &#8220;Ubuntu: Linux for human beings&#8221; slogan, until a friend of mine spotted it on the back of my laptop and asked me: &#8220;who else would it be for? Aliens?&#8221;<br />
Which is great! It shows that Linux is losing its image of being too difficult for normal people. We can move on to a new slogan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thorsten Wilms</title>
		<link>http://doctormo.org/2010/03/04/new-ubuntu-branding/comment-page-1/#comment-3033</link>
		<dc:creator>Thorsten Wilms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctormo.ubuntu-ma.us/?p=2002#comment-3033</guid>
		<description>Gotta love that there are 2 logo-types, best kept apart by looking for the cross-bar of the &quot;t&quot;. For all I know you have the earlier draft version in your post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta love that there are 2 logo-types, best kept apart by looking for the cross-bar of the &#8220;t&#8221;. For all I know you have the earlier draft version in your post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
